4815162342.com
4815162342.com
LOST Forums - Numbers, Theories, & More
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Become a VIP Member! $14.95 per year
Click here for more info

Look! New T-Shirt Designs Available
Look! New T-Shirt Designs Available
NEW Lost-Inspired Shirts & More!

Pentangle Prologue: A recursive constant.
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    4815162342.com Forum Index -> Theories
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Turing's Ghost
Lost Expert


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Pentangle Prologue: A recursive constant. Reply with quote

Pentangle A-Z. Black words hiding in the darkness. Few following this thread will ever read them. Pentangle; the story within many others here, will emerge slowly. It is quite relevant to actual past and current events, in LOST and beyond. Much within the text is camouflaged, including strings of link trails that jump around the lost metaverse. Why? It is a message inside the note in the proverbial ‘bottle.’ It was never intended for the eyes of the many; only the elect. The timeframes have yet to be determined, likewise many details of the 5 courses creating much of the PENTANGLE plot. Real events will determine the finale. This Matroshka like story in a really begins with an email written on 8/16/04, before LOST first aired. It both follows and transcends the 8/16/42 letter that started this Lost ‘point’ of the Pentangle. We started with four farsighted individuals seeking to insure that the bully pulpit offered by electronic communications would not be compromised. Now we jump ahead to that envisioned new millennium. Some of the ‘disappeared’ as well as ‘ghosts’ haunting this forum will be reviewed. Social networks functioning on various levels with vague agendas will also be considered. Looking through the Looking Glass? Stepping on through to the other side? The Watcher remembers, the mirror reflects.
This prologue will focus primarily on one aspect of the recursive structure of LOST: the timeline. It is part of my conjecture that mirror numbers and realities will all evolve as a series of retro-loops within the plot. This includes jumping around in time, as we have already seen. All will begin and end in real time. As Pentangle is a history-based mirror fiction of LOST, the show will become a future based fictional mirror of their/our reality. The time frame at the end will loop back to the beginning of our mutual observation; Flight 815.


We know LOST will end in 2010. It began, both in reality and within the story, on 9/22/04. This matching of the date in the plot with that of its airing was a clue that timeframes would play a big role in the mystery that followed. It would be quite consistent with what has been presented so far for all we’ve witnessed to ultimately be revealed as a flashback from some future point. Making this date 5/18 will provide the final mirror number occurrence, looping back to where our mutual observation began; the end of Flight 815. This would be a truly Escheresque recursion!



The easiest way for the creative team to maintain a coherent timeline would be to present all the events in retrospect. Having the date LOST ends match the date within the show would also be consistent with the way it began. We will likely learn before the last 2 part finale that all has been a flashback by certain key characters. I suspect this was a major factor in Lindelöf and Cuse saying they would walk if an end date couldn’t be agreed upon. They needed that termination point. Without it they could only create the kind of story loop similar to what Escher did above; based on illusionary, illogical pathways.


All we have seen, from my perspective of the plot, are past events. We will continue to view what happened in terms of the story until 2010. This will explain all the timeframe anomalies without going into the realm of sci-fi/fantasy or the paranormal. TPTB have assured us this would not happen. What is viewed in contrast to ’04 as ‘flashing’ forward in time to ’07, will by 2010 all be in the past, for both the survivors and for us. Understanding this kind of recursion will help to really follow the LOST chronology/plot, and that of the Pentangle. It won’t be absolutely necessary though; like a song you like without understanding all the words.


Consider; it was a 2007 model Mercedes (below) in what some are now calling a ‘flash-forward’ from this seasons first episode. Problem is, there are no such ‘flashes’ in the real world. We have moments of deja vous, but not from the future OR the present. Was it coincidence the year they were revisiting in the finale is again the same-’07-as when the show was aired? Don’t be surprised if we learn later the 2010 flashbacks from this season’s finale all took place on 5/23/07.




Some believe in premonitions, though none can really be verified. Detailed visions of events in our future however, are clearly impossible. The writers pledge that all would be rationally explained should also rule out: time travel; equations precisely predicting Armageddon; numerous people surviving a plane breaking into 3 sections in flight at 1000 feet; and nanotech security systems that can drag people along the ground or cause them to revisit life altering moments from their past.


Heisenberg proved via his ‘Uncertainty Principle’ that the observed are inevitably affected and altered by the very act of observation. This theme is prominent in LOST, from the hatches to Dharma itself. Do you find it plausible, given the amount of money at stake, that ABC wouldn’t be observing the discussions on sites such as this? Have we been ‘affected?’ Are those who observe also being watched, as in LOST? If you read PENTANGLE you will better understand how recursion will come into play telling the stories of the ‘survivors’ of Flight 815 as well as the one woven into this thread. The beginning of the end is also the end of the beginning in this story.



A CHANGE IN PERSPECTIVE:

What has been presented in Pentangle thus far has dealt primarily with the past aspects of how LOST began. Now we shall ‘flash-forward’ from 1942 when the Dharma Initiative launched us into the present; “Days of Future Past?”


There are countless dilemmas facing all of us that mirror those of the castaways. If we have to live together or die alone, which will we choose? Which will they? What can we learn through our thorough examinations of their choices? What will be the influence of the fan-sites on the future direction of the show? Has anything of value been learned? Can we connect the dots in time? Next, on LOST……..



______________________________________The Lies shall reveal the truth. For those who would point out 5/18/10 falls on a Tuesday, I believe they will bump the finale ahead one day to end on this mirror number. The rest computes if the last sixteen episodes begin the first Wednesday in February. From here this thread will travel just beyond LOST into a larger story’s genesis. It will show how an earlier series of events created a ripple on this site and became: Literary Ontological Simulation Triangulator. Deconstruct!


Last edited by Turing's Ghost on Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:42 pm; edited 50 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Agent Dale Cooper
One of Them


Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 4036
Location: Way down below the ocean (where I long to be)

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read it...have to digest it...
_________________

Sig by SaP

Boagorn12 wrote:
Aaron, open your case as best you can
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zombie_soiree
I know the secret


Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 16442

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love it so far, TG. Waiting to see the update before I comment. Very Happy

Z
_________________
"My name is Peggy Olsen, and I want to smoke some marijuana."

The Form of Things Unknown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IamTotallyLost
Lost is my Life


Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 651

PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, basically "The matrix is older than you know. I prefer counting from the emergence of one integral anomaly to the emergence of the next, in which case this is the sixth version."... bleh.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cocaine-Love-Frenzy
Lost Junkie


Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

anyways, TuringsGhost, you're theories are intriguing, and i honestly can't wait to see what else you have to say about this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Turing's Ghost
Lost Expert


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:40 pm    Post subject: Thanks to all--a typically belated reply....are you Lost? Reply with quote

Agent Dale Cooper wrote:
Read it...have to digest it...


Thanks a lot for taking the time to read it Dale. I read a lot of your replies going back through Sir Andrew’s earlier theories. I meant to post a box of literary Tums at the bottom but forgot. Your next meal is on the house.


zombie_soiree wrote:
I love it so far, TG. Waiting to see the update before I comment. Very Happy

Z


I hate it so far, Dr. Z. Waiting to see your comment before I update. Surely you must realize this whole story loops back to you, the mad genius who created the UNIX based ElizaazilE software that is infiltrating virtually every Lost fan site and posting through a variety of sockpuppets on every forum. It can eventually swing the debate in whatever way deemed necessary to set the stage for the Zeta release. Who better than Dr. ‘Z,’ the cyber-‘Zombie in the machine’ to reveal it? Please don’t destroy me now that I’ve revealed your secret. It may not even be true, ok? Do you come in peace?-Al

IamTotallyLost wrote:
So, basically "The matrix is older than you know. I prefer counting from the emergence of one integral anomaly to the emergence of the next, in which case this is the sixth version."... bleh.


Not sure exactly what you mean by this ITL-what is the integral anomaly to which you refer, and the second? Do you mean on Lost, or within the Pentangle? And yes, I suspect the complete matrix of interactive connection is always greater than we know. I see that increasingly as I develop this topic. Let me know.

Cocaine-Love-Frenzy wrote:
anyways, TuringsGhost, you're theories are intriguing, a
nd i honestly can't wait to see what else you have to say about this.


Mother……is that you?? Shocked

Laughing Cocacita, you have once again made my day. I have so often considered abandoning this project as there are so many other more comprehensible theories out there that require far less reading. Thank you so much for the encouragement, and I only hope I can come up with a satisfactory ending.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Agent Dale Cooper
One of Them


Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 4036
Location: Way down below the ocean (where I long to be)

PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trying to think back about Riemann and what he said about transfinite numbers and how that might factor in....but should the milion dollar prize ever be claimed it would mean the end of things as we know it...collapse of bank commerce for one thing........This thread has me thinking deep..thanks
_________________

Sig by SaP

Boagorn12 wrote:
Aaron, open your case as best you can
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
just another other
One of Them


Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4989
Location: I know the secret. Take that, post count.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is interesting reading, but where are you going with it? How exactly does this stuff relate?
_________________
Time.

"Who knows mibbeess vincent will push the donkey wheel and woof woof i gots meself a dog too."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigbadAds
Lost Aficionado


Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 196

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:07 pm    Post subject: Schrodingers Cat Reply with quote

I think it is possible as viewers of lost we are subject to quantum indeterminacy or the observer's paradox as stipulated by the quantum theory of superposition (Erwin Schrodinger 1936). I really can't be arsed to try and explain this fully, but essentially... Schrodinger proposed that if he placed his cat in a sealed box with a tiny amount of radioactive material and a cannister of hydrocyanic acid, and the vial of acid would only break and result in the cats death if a single atom of the radioactive substance were to decay. What all this meant according to Schrodinger is that whilst the box remained closed, and the observer did not know if the radioactive material had decayed or not , thus did not know whether the cat was dead or alive, then the cat actually existed in two states (dead and alive) at once. It is only when the box is opened that the cat becomes either dead OR alive.

My point here is the Lost island is Schrodingers box, the Losties are the cat. Are they dead or alive? Only opening the box will reveal this.

P.S No cats were harmed in this experiment...


"Even God can't see this Island"...Ben, Season 2. Razz
_________________
my karma ran over your dogma
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cocaine-Love-Frenzy
Lost Junkie


Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 59

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The Riemann Zeta Hypothesis was formulated in 1859. It is considered by most in the field to be mathematics’ most important problem. The last 140 years did not bring its proof, yet there are a considerable number of important math theorems which depend on the Hypothesis being true. The one million dollar reward for anyone who can provide the equation that proves Riemann’s hypothesis is truly laughable in contrast to what it would actually be worth. Zeta holds the key to not only the mysterious harmonics of the primes, but also much of Number Theory and physics. One example? If you could accurately chart all the prime numbers along a predictable curve, you could crack any code encryption in cyberspace. All the walls of privacy that protect us online are based on very large prime numbers. (Below-Bernard Riemann)


Why does anyone need to prove it's true? if they assume that it is (true), couldn't they just go ahead and use it for whatever purpose they so desire?

and after reading your theories (and loving them all) i went on the hunt for the Riemann Zeta Hypothesis, but I can't find it anywhere. on wikipedia there are a bunch of equations but which one is the Riemann Hypothesis? could you post a picture of the hypothesis or whatever it is?

what i'm trying to say is, and i'll use an analogy for guys like me who feel a bit lost. The zeta Hypothesis is like, say, a gun. (just for the sake of this example). now mathematicians need to prove that the gun can fire (that the hypothesis is true), but why do they need to prove that it fires by counting the particles of gunpowder in the bullet, when they could just assume that it will fire (that it is true) and pull the trigger? wouldn't it be the same with the Riemann Zeta hypothesis? why count the billions of zeros when you can just use the hypothesis and see if it does what you think it does?

or am i completely off about how the hypothesis works?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Turing's Ghost
Lost Expert


Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:28 am    Post subject: I'm starting to dream about non-trivial zereos. More trivia. Reply with quote

Agent Dale Cooper wrote:
Trying to think back about Riemann and what he said about transfinite numbers and how that might factor in....but should the milion dollar prize ever be claimed it would mean the end of things as we know it...collapse of bank commerce for one thing........This thread has me thinking deep..thanks


Good thinking Dale. It has always amazed me that there is no real plan for dealing with the very possibility you mention. Part of the reason is that until they have the proof they will not know for sure how to adjust. It is part of why projects like the Zeta Grid have kept plowing along. They are only up to 10 billion zeroes doing it the slow way-running all the numbers involved with computers. Even a trillion won’t bring us much closer to the proof, but it does establish a larger base to stand on.

just another other wrote:
This is interesting reading, but where are you going with it? How exactly does this stuff relate?


JAO-Good question. Wish I knew for sure. Do you suppose the Lost creative team knows for certain how they will answer all the questions? No disagreements among them? No pressures from the networks, from production costs to timeframe/casting considerations? What I was kind of hoping for was a communal effort. Dr. Z has provided some great food for thought, and one user added some possibly relevant Einstein quotes. Another made a recent reconnection between Disney and Pixar, and JLS reminded me of Flatland. Perhaps by analyzing the way we construct a not true but credible/believable scenario of the real history surrounding the fiction of Lost, we can determine the fictional historical reality? Sorry. I experience lapses of dyslexia looking into all the mirror images at play here. My point is that we all adjust our conjectures with each new episode and weave them within. What distinguishes this topic is its attempt to mirror Lost similar to the way the LE does, only using real people and events.

BigbadAds wrote:
What all this meant according to Schrodinger is that whilst the box remained closed, and the observer did not know if the radioactive material had decayed or not , thus did not know whether the cat was dead or alive, then the cat actually existed in two states (dead and alive) at once. It is only when the box is opened that the cat becomes either dead OR alive.

My point here is the Lost island is Schrodingers box, the Losties are the cat. Are they dead or alive? Only opening the box will reveal this.


Good observation, Bigbad. Been thinking about that very cat lately, and may have even mentioned it somewhere in Pentangle part 1. I like your analogy. And it is interactive much in the same way lost is. It is OUR curiosity that might literally kill the Lost cat, which like Schrodinger's might already be dead anyway. Of course the cat that curiosity kills will have learned more in that one lifetime than a 100 incurious dogs. I will add more to this reply in future when I can find some earlier thoughts I wrote out on this very subject. Thanks for reminding me; good observation.

Cocaine-Love-Frenzy wrote:


Why does anyone need to prove it's true? if they assume that it is (true), couldn't they just go ahead and use it for whatever purpose they so desire?

and after reading your theories (and loving them all) i went on the hunt for the Riemann Zeta Hypothesis, but I can't find it anywhere. on wikipedia there are a bunch of equations but which one is the Riemann Hypothesis? could you post a picture of the hypothesis or whatever it is?

what i'm trying to say is, and i'll use an analogy for guys like me who feel a bit lost. The zeta Hypothesis is like, say, a gun. (just for the sake of this example). now mathematicians need to prove that the gun can fire (that the hypothesis is true), but why do they need to prove that it fires by counting the particles of gunpowder in the bullet, when they could just assume that it will fire (that it is true) and pull the trigger? wouldn't it be the same with the Riemann Zeta hypothesis? why count the billions of zeros when you can just use the hypothesis and see if it does what you think it does?

or am i completely off about how the hypothesis works?


CLF-they say genius is the recognition of the obvious, so maybe you are one. After reading your question I realized it was one of several key issues I have never explained. Doh!! OK, assuming the Zeta gun will always fire as assumed is exactly what they do now. The R-zeta equation itself appears in the footnotes in Numbers, but it likely won’t mean much to you, so lets extend your gun metaphor.

Say you know how many particles of gunpowder it will take to fire a 9mm bullet. You can extend that to a much larger shell, with some adjustments for the variations involved, without too much difficulty. But how about a huge gun (one was designed) that could fire a projectile the size of a small car into space? To do this you would need to know far more than a straight extrapolation of the particles required to launch the 9mm shell for just a mile or so.

Proving that Zeta works out to 10 billion zeroes does NOT mean somewhere around 100 Trillion you won’t find an anomaly where it does not comply, and there goes the ball game. If you had the right equation to instead project those zeroes with certainty, you would not only know there were no lurking inconsistencies in the formula, but you could then use it to determine all the Prime numbers into infinity and much else.

I know this explanation is still lacking, and will keep working on it. Thanks so much for clearly stating the question though-which undoubtedly many others had also-as it will assist my struggle to make this concept more ‘digestible.’ I have a few other ideas on how to take us closer and will try and put them in the next update. I sort of sense it numerically but putting it into word is a real challenge.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lachymac
I pressed the button


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 1007
Location: Sitting on my new motorbike

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i wrote this in the sissy wenchfry the other day...

its a more detailed description of the time travel thing...

oh and by the way it has been proved... i'll explain after this...

NEVER!!.. it's not magic.. it's science... please let me explain...

ok.. if you COULD do this then it would actually work.. now.. we should all know that it is not physically possible to travell at the speed of light.. and if you dont then now you do..

it's not that we cant make a mchine that does it (although we cant) it's just that it's impossible even if you did have a machine that could do it you still couldnt do it lol.. now obviously, everything is made up of atoms.. in these atoms are eletrons, protons and neutrons.. maybe some other stuff but i dunno lol.. the electrons are the bits spinning around the protons and neutrons, they are spinning extremely fast, ALMOST, the speed of light.. now because they are so close to the speed of light, even if you just walk at 2m/ph or so those electrons actually slow down BECAUSE they can not excede the speed of light.. so as they get to the top or bottom of their tiny orbit, depending on which direction you're going they'll have to slow down, they can speed up again as they spin the other way but they slow down during that brief time that they are going the same direction as you are..

now obviously when you are walking the difference is going to be so minute that it's not worth mentioning.. something like trying to go the edge of the universe but only walking to your front door..

so even if you were travelling in a plane going the speed of sound it wouldnt make that much difference.. almost none.. just like the difference between .999recuuring and 1 lol

BUT if you were to get into a space shuttle that could orbit the earth at NEAR the speed of light every electron in every atom in your body would have to slow down imensely so as not to excede the speed of light..

i think the figure is.. if you travel very close to the speed of light the electrons would slow down enough so as that if you orbited the earth for one day in your own relative time, then six months would have passed on earth and you would have only aged a day..

now you dont notice this difference because time is relative so to you, you still think you are moving at a normal speed but because all of those electrons have slowed down, you have to, including your aging process..

so basically if someone could watch you while you were in this near light speed orbit all they would see is you moving very, very slowly.. so slow that you would appear motionless except that after a few days you would noitice a difference in position...

now that all makes sense to me lol but if anyone has any questions because i've explained it badly ASK AWAY..

So YES, TIME TRAVEL IS POSSIBLE but only into the future..


Now for how it was proved...

NASA sent an atomic clock into orit around the earth and left it to orbit at the highest speed they could get it for like 5 years... this atomic (atomic meaning it gets its time via satelites which map the exact position of the earth relative to the sun and sets itself to within billionths and bilionths of a second, hence it's always synchronised with other atomic clocks) came back to earth after 5 years and was all of a sudden a couple of hundreths of a second behind any other atomic clock... hence proving the theory... now a few hindreths of a second might not seem like much but in the scale of how accurate these clocks are, it's a lot... a hell of a lot...
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
just another other
One of Them


Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 4989
Location: I know the secret. Take that, post count.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Turing's Ghost wrote:
just another other wrote:
This is interesting reading, but where are you going with it? How exactly does this stuff relate?


JAO-Good question. Wish I knew for sure. Do you suppose the Lost creative team knows for certain how they will answer all the questions? No disagreements among them? No pressures from the networks, from production costs to timeframe/casting considerations? What I was kind of hoping for was a communal effort. Dr. Z has provided some great food for thought, and one user added some possibly relevant Einstein quotes. Another made a recent reconnection between Disney and Pixar, and JLS reminded me of Flatland. Perhaps by analyzing the way we construct a not true but credible/believable scenario of the real history surrounding the fiction of Lost, we can determine the fictional historical reality? Sorry. I experience lapses of dyslexia looking into all the mirror images at play here. My point is that we all adjust our conjectures with each new episode and weave them within. What distinguishes this topic is its attempt to mirror Lost similar to the way the LE does, only using real people and events.


Okay. Just making sure that there wasn't some sort of blaring hole for information somewhere that you were preparing to throw at us in an impending update. Wink

lachymac:

Is that all really possible? I know that it must be to some degree, but is it in the extreme that you have mentioned??

I'm pleasantly surprised. Is there any way then that this information could be applied to LOST? If time-travel as such is not possible, but time (let's call it) 'control' is, then could that be a potential avenue for us to explore in regard to Desmond? I am not a particular fan of all this time stuff, but it is inevitably going to be important, so let's look at what you have mentioned there... is it fathomable that Dessy is somehow travelling so fast that he is both on the island, and still in the real world??

Ridiculously ambitious, I know, but let's give it a shot.
_________________
Time.

"Who knows mibbeess vincent will push the donkey wheel and woof woof i gots meself a dog too."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
zombie_soiree
I know the secret


Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 16442

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:02 pm    Post subject: Re: A Recursive Pentangle: Time/Space Travel? The Twin Parad Reply with quote

At this point I feel like I can contribute something, but let me first see if I am following your train of thought:

"Lost"-qua-television show is essentially the most visible manifestation of a didactic exercise that repeats itself from writ-large (TV, multi-million dollar pilot) to writ-small (online subplots) to writ-smaller still (online communities) to writ-incredibly-small (online "entities" like ourselves). At each instance, "Lost" is fully repeated--a whole show, a whole ARG, a whole online community, a whole person--with a beginning and end. Some finish before others, so we get a sense of time travel--i.e. we can see the end of "Lost" the TV show before we end our lives. According to the recursive nature of "Lost," in fact, the show much complete its cycle before we can complete ours. The full cycle of this program is simply one stage in our own cycle. The purpose of launching this project, from the creators' part, was basically to put things in motion--to "spin" larger web communities and individuals in a particular way, like a collection of dreidels.

Correct me if I'm misreading you.

Z
_________________
"My name is Peggy Olsen, and I want to smoke some marijuana."

The Form of Things Unknown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Agent Dale Cooper
One of Them


Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 4036
Location: Way down below the ocean (where I long to be)

PostPosted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:17 pm    Post subject: Re: A Recursive Pentangle: Time/Space Travel? The Twin Parad Reply with quote

zombie_soiree wrote:
At this point I feel like I can contribute something, but let me first see if I am following your train of thought:

"Lost"-qua-television show is essentially the most visible manifestation of a didactic exercise that repeats itself from writ-large (TV, multi-million dollar pilot) to writ-small (online subplots) to writ-smaller still (online communities) to writ-incredibly-small (online "entities" like ourselves). At each instance, "Lost" is fully repeated--a whole show, a whole ARG, a whole online community, a whole person--with a beginning and end. Some finish before others, so we get a sense of time travel--i.e. we can see the end of "Lost" the TV show before we end our lives. According to the recursive nature of "Lost," in fact, the show much complete its cycle before we can complete ours. The full cycle of this program is simply one stage in our own cycle. The purpose of launching this project, from the creators' part, was basically to put things in motion--to "spin" larger web communities and individuals in a particular way, like a collection of dreidels.

Correct me if I'm misreading you.

Z


Not sure so much he is saying spin in a particular way but if the proof is ever worked out would basically predict the way it would 'spin'...does that make sense? It is a tough and deep one!
_________________

Sig by SaP

Boagorn12 wrote:
Aaron, open your case as best you can
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    4815162342.com Forum Index -> Theories All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19  Next
Page 1 of 19

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Buy LOST Puzzles from TDC Games!
Buy Lost Season 4 on DVD and Blu Ray
Buy the LOST book "Bad Twin" by Gary Troup
4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 T-Shirts and Merchandise!
4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 T-Shirts and Merchandise!
4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 T-Shirts and Merchandise!